| 8.30 | |
Registration & Coffee
|
| 9.00 | |
Chairman's Opening RemarksJesus Zurdo, Head of Innovation, Biopharma Development, Lonza Biologics View Bio
|
| 9.10 |  |
Implementing QbD in early developmentDavid Lathbury, Vice President of Chemical Development, AMRI View Bio
- The foundation stone of QbD is process understanding
- Many observations made in early development are neglected until later on in development
- This represents a missed opportunity
|
| 9.45 |  |
Drug substance design requirementsMichael Leane, Principal Scientist, Materials Science, Bristol Myers Squibb View Bio
- Biopharmaceutical and drug product manufacturing considerations when optimizing drug substance properties
- Use of modelling tools and institutional knowledge to assist the process
- How to efficiently manage the QBD paradigm through the development cycle
- Biopharmaceutical and drug product manufacturing considerations when optimizing drug substance properties
- Use of modelling tools and institutional knowledge to assist the process
- How to efficiently manage the QBD paradigm through the development cycle
|
| 10.20 | |
Morning Coffee
|
| 11.15 |  |
Novel feedback control-based Quality by Design approaches for crystallisation processes using composite PAT-array and a crystallisation process informatics systemZoltan K Nagy, Professor of Chemical Engineering , Purdue University View Bio
- Application of composite process analytical technology (PAT) array for monitoring crystallisation processes
- Presentation of the Crystallisation Process Informatics System (CryPRINS) as an intelligent decision support and control system for crystallisation product design
- Direct design and rapid scale-up of crystallisation processes using concentration feedback control and automated direct nucleation control (ADNC)
- Application of ADNC for the control of size, shape, polymorphic form and purity of pharmaceutical products
- Controlling crystal shape distribution using growth modifiers
- Monitoring and control of continuous crystallisation systems
|
| 11.50 |  |
Practical statistics for effective QbD in development from design of experiments to design space
- Connecting the dots from the factory floor to the patient outcomes
- Presenting statistical software solutions to achieve effectively QbD in development
- Numerous examples on processes, analytical procedures and bioassays
- Effective implementation of Q8 applied from small molecules to vaccines
|
| 12.30 | |
Networking Lunch
|
| 13.30 |  |
Early risk mitigation approaches for selecting & designing better and safer biopharmaceuticals and avoid downstream complicationsJesus Zurdo, Head of Innovation, Biopharma Development, Lonza Biologics View Bio
- Where ‘research’ meets ‘development’. Selecting and designing quality & functional attributes in lead candidates (pre-process QbD?)
- Early assessment of developability & safety to reduce attrition and costs
- In silico tools to predict and tune down developability & immunogenicity issues
- Early (surrogate) parameters for risk assessment. When the devil is not in the detail
|
| 14.10 |  |
QbD for the development of antibody based bio-therapeutics Mariangela Spitali, Associate Director, UCB View Bio
- In the era of QbD, systematic and data-driven approaches to bio-therapeutics are needed more than ever
- Such approaches are resource-intensive, costly and contradict the need for being lean and fast, particularly in early development
- Is it possible to satisfy the “need for speed” in early development without compromising the systematic approach needed for building quality into processes and products?
|
| 14.50 | |
Afternoon Tea
|
| 15.10 |  |
Implementation of DoE methodology for vaccine process development to better understand and efficiently processNicolas Chaudet, Upstream Platform/Fermentation Unit , Sanofi Pasteur View Bio
- Vaccine process : DoE, an attractive tool to overcome the process development challenges from upstream to formulation and filling steps
- DoE application : a perpetual compromise between methodology, information expected, scale down model, capacity and timelines
- Case study : implementation of scale down model combined with DoE for process modelisation and improvement of vaccine manufacturing process at industrial scale
|
| 15.50 |  |
The use of risk management to ensure the quality of viral vectors for clinical trial useEleanor Berrie, Qualified Person, University of Oxford Clinical BioManufacturing Facility View Bio
- How do we ensure full traceability of starting materials for viral vectors?
- What are the risks associated with the starting material for GMP manufacture of viral vectors?
- How can the hazards be mitigated?
- Possible issues due to the novelty of such IMPs and disease targets
- Our experience to date
|
| 16.30 |  |
PANEL DISCUSSION: QbD - where are we and what are the prospects for the future?Jesus Zurdo, Head of Innovation, Biopharma Development, Lonza Biologics View Bio David Lathbury, Vice President of Chemical Development, AMRI View Bio Zoltan K Nagy, Professor of Chemical Engineering , Purdue University View Bio
Panellists will share strategies to move therapeutic entities from creation to development and commercialisation. How can scientific evidence and molecular pharmacology best link with manufacturing process parameters and clinical activity relationships? Improving real-time monitoring, specifications and product analysis for APIs,excipients, biologics and ATMPs to maximise patient benefit will all be considered.
Panellists will share strategies to move therapeutic entities from creation to development and commercialisation. How can scientific evidence and molecular pharmacology best link with manufacturing process parameters and clinical activity relationships? Improving real-time monitoring, specifications and product analysis for APIs,excipients, biologics and ATMPs to maximise patient benefit will all be considered.
Panellists will share strategies to move therapeutic entities from creation to development and commercialisation. How can scientific evidence and molecular pharmacology best link with manufacturing process parameters and clinical activity relationships? Improving real-time monitoring, specifications and product analysis for APIs,excipients, biologics and ATMPs to maximise patient benefit will all be considered.
Panellists will share strategies to move therapeutic entities from creation to development and commercialisation. How can scientific evidence and molecular pharmacology best link with manufacturing process parameters and clinical activity relationships? Improving real-time monitoring, specifications and product analysis for APIs,excipients, biologics and ATMPs to maximise patient benefit will all be considered.
|
| 17.00 | |
Chairman’s Closing Remarks and Close of Day One
|